On the heels of yesterday’s report of an Obamacare advocate chomping down on an Obamacare opponent, there’s been a peculiar yet interesting defense offered by many on behalf of the hungry socialist’s approach to advancing his cause.
In an intriguing display of rationalization and convoluted political pragmatism, a good many Obamacare zealots have made the case that the urgent need for healthcare in the aftermath of a pro-Obama zombie attack actually strengthens the case for additional government involvement in the healthcare industry. Furthermore, any Obamacare opponents using existing government programs to cope with the effects of such an assault are said to have revealed themselves to be total and complete hypocrites in the process, or so the zombie logic goes.
The argument flows something like this:
1) Pro-Obamacare zombie bites off Obamacare opponent’s finger.
2) Obamacare opponent then seeks medical attention using an existing government program.
3) Pro-Obamacare zombie says, “Aha! See! Aren’t you glad you have that government program in place to help stitch you up after I just tried to eat you?”
4) Pro-Obamacare zombie basks in the glow of scoring multiple victories for the glorious cause of national socialism.
So, by biting into and severing the finger of an Obamacare opponent, an Obamacare advocate can both advance the cause of socialism on numerous fronts and satisfy his inherent urge to consume and eliminate all opposition.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what pro-socialistic activism is all about.