Why Gays Love (and Laugh at) Christian Appeals to “Religious Tolerance”

Gay

One by one, lessons as to how things actually work in the real world are piling up. (And by “the real world”, I mean the real one…as in: owned, operated, and defined by God.)

One by one, the casualty list is growing (and usually at a pace that makes single casualties’ distinctions blur).

One by one, thresholds are reached and then breached. Unthinkable new lows are reached and then quickly become normative on the way down to the next “unthinkable” new low (and soon to be new norm).

One by one, the lies we’ve been pitched, sold and enthusiastically embraced as truth are being revealed to be nothing better than the most vile and corrosive of lies.

This is what happens when cultures buy into the serpent’s spin on how things work in “the real world”.

Nowhere have the consequences of Christians buying into the serpent’s take on “real world” living been more apparent than in the ongoing hot-knife-through-butter campaign of the LGBT(QRSTUV…) movement. While the forces of secular “progress” and enforced pagan tolerance seem to understand that they cannot tolerate the continued presence and influence of obedient Christians in the culture, their efforts to persecute Christians into silence has been most greatly aided by professing Christians themselves who have compliantly provided the “hot butter” through which the knife of Secularism now cuts with little, if any, meaningful resistance. (See also: Let Them Eat Gay Cake: Corporate America’s Pro-Gay Blitz Hits Delicious New Lows.)

Most Christians aiming to defend the owners of the Sweet Cakes bakery, who were forced out of business for refusing to create a “gay wedding” cake and are still being hounded relentlessly by The Forces of Tolerance, are even now relying on secular pragmatic arguments that often directly contradict Word of God as the standard by which we all must live.

In a recent article posted at Fox News, we learn that “Big Christian” names in the middle of the battle are still clinging to religious pluralism as a virtue that will somehow, some way, save the day for biblically obedient Christians. This bizarre turning of biblical truth on its head may be painful to witness and tiresome to contemplate again and again as it repeats its failed arguments and approaches for the zillionth time (what was it that Einstein said about that sort of thing?), but we are well served to do just that. If we love all of those involved in this battle, and we seek to honor the Lord in an effective manner on the battlefield in which we’ve been purposefully placed, then we must point out at every critical opportunity that standing on anything other than the Word of God as our basis for life in the real world – His real world – can, will, and should ultimately lead to ever increasing darkness and ultimately death.

To put a finer point on it: Claiming Christianity while standing for the “virtue” of religious pluralism is never, ever, ever gonna get us anywhere good. God despises religious pluralism as it is now championed by America-first “Christians”, and we must repent of that view before true cultural resurrection can be achieved.

As for the ongoing pragmatic/pluralistic defenses of Aaron and Melissa Klein (of Sweet Cakes by Melissa fame), Todd Starnes recently wrote for Fox News that:

Franklin Graham has announced he will back a fundraising effort to help Aaron and Melissa Klein, the owners of Sweet Cakes By Melissa in Oregon.

“We’re all in real danger if something isn’t done to put a stop to this kind of deliberate targeting and malicious treatment of Christians,” Graham wrote on his Facebook page.

On Friday a judge for the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) recommended a lesbian couple should receive $135,000 in damages for their emotional suffering after the Kleins refused to make them a wedding cake.

The Kleins have already lost their home. Now the government and the LGBT activists want to throw them out on the street.

The article continued to chronicle some significant twists and details:

Within hours of the ruling, the Family Research Council facilitated the establishment of a GoFundMe account to help the Christian family raise the money they needed to pay the fine. In less than eight hours, more than $100,000 was raised.

However, late Friday GoFundMe pulled the plug — sending this message to would-be donors:

“After careful review by our team, we have found the ‘Support Sweet Cakes By Melissa’ campaign to be in violation of our Terms and Conditions,” the message read. “The money raised thus far will still be made available for withdrawal.”

Family Research Council president Tony Perkins said GoFundMe caved under pressure from gay activists.

Enter Franklin Graham.

He decided to let people donate to the Klein family through Samaritan’s Purse.

“The Kleins have already had to close their Oregon bakery business, Sweet Cakes by Melissa and do not have this money to pay,” Graham wrote. “Aaron said it would financially ruin their family and could cost them their home. They have done nothing wrong, and their lives, along with their five children, have been turned upside down by this persecution.”

Graham doubled down on his assertion that what is happening to the family is persecution.

“You can’t call it anything else,” he wrote. “This is wrong, and it’s happening right here in our own country. Liberal judges and officials siding with the LGBT crowd are trying to make a point with the undeserved punishment of this family. This is America—we should have the freedom to live by our sincerely held religious beliefs. It’s obvious who is really being discriminated against here.”

Notice that last line: “This is America—we should have the freedom to live by our sincerely held religious beliefs.”

Now ask yourself this: Did Franklin Graham (and those parroting the same by-now-obviously-ineffective “defense”) get that argument from Scripture or from somewhere else…like maybe secular American tradition? In order to believe that this same freedom extends to, say, Muslims in America, is there any way to reconcile this veneration of (and subsequent dependence upon) religious pluralism with the Nature of the one true God as revealed in His Word?

Nope.

And we all know it.

Yet we keep right on appealing to the idol of religious pluralism so that it might provide our salvation, when the God that we claim with our lips clearly and lovingly demands that we take a completely different path.

FBCPleaseHelpRed300pw

The fact that God despises the sort of religious pluralism that the likes of Graham constantly appeal to as a defense for beleaguered Christians ought to tell us something. Many somethings, actually. Perhaps chief among them being that we just might be bringing the judgment of God down upon these Christian-run businesses by our constant appeals to things like All-American religious pluralism, which stand in direct contradiction to the crystal clear Word of God.

So, in effect, it seems quite likely that, once again, professing Christians in America are most responsible for bringing about their own persecution and the ongoing darkening of the culture. (See: Judgment begins with the Church…not the Democrats.)

All of this is happening because we as professing Christians have bought into the foundational lie that God is personally non-essential when it comes to cultural or civilizational life in detail.

The Deadly Myth of Neutrality

One of the most popular and assumed-to-be-true lies that has come to define our culture is the myth of neutrality – the idea that anyone (or any group or any government) can take a position that is neutral with regard to any aspect of God’s Nature as clearly revealed in His Word.

The world tells us that it is not only possible, but necessary for men, women, groups and governments to take “neutral” positions on any number of clear pronouncements from God where those pronouncements challenge or conflict with the accepted and often cherished norms here in “the real world” – a “real world” that, we are told, isn’t actually under the rule of God in any kind of detailed, comprehensive manner.

This myth of neutrality is an echo from Eden that is so utterly appealing to our sinful, selfish nature that, apart from the saving grace of God, we find it irresistible. Our inherent desire to judge God, test God, correct God, reject God, and ultimately replace God (with ourselves) in practice is irrepressible apart from the supernatural intervention of God in our lives, raising us from spiritual death unto life and inspiring us to broken repentance over our sin so that we might then, all by His grace, begin to pursue the holiness that we once hated while resisting the sin that we once adored.

Once again in the case of Sweet Cakes by Melissa, our only true hope lies in the Nature of God as revealed in His perfect, sufficient Word. Once again, the Gospel-fueled Great Commission is our only legitimate response to every argument from any angle in this episode of the ongoing culture war in America.

Appeals to the things that God hates – like religious pluralism – cannot save us.

Submitting to the Forces of Tolerance and surrendering yet another hill on the cultural  battlefield will not save us.

Appealing to God’s Nature as revealed in His Word and submitting to Christ as King in practice is our only hope. It is all that we need. And infinitely more.

Lord willing, His people will realize this while there is yet time so that they might drop the plastic weapons that our enemies insist we use and take up instead the Sword of Truth and the Gospel-fueled Great Commission, by which every enemy can and will be conquered, by His grace, for His glory, and to our eternal benefit.

~

If you know of anyone who might appreciate this post, please share it. If you’d like to help support the Fire Breathing Christian mission, please click here.

Please also “like” us on Facebook and feel free to sign up for new articles by email using the button in the upper right corner of the FBC home page. Thank you for your support!

© 2015 Scott Alan Buss – All Rights Reserved.
Soli Deo Gloria!

Comic2V2Front650pw

7 COMMENTS

  1. Also you seem to think that everyone that exists HAS to live by the word of God (meaning the christian bible) This has never and will never be true. There is more than one religion in this world and there is nothing wrong with that. Get your head out of the sand and start living the life God has given you instead of trying to prove your views and questioning everyone else's lives. There is something better for you out there than this crap.

  2. This entire thing sounds more like terrorism than christianity. I bet many "christians" here would love to be a part of a modern day crusades against gays instead of pagans. The fact that most christians today believe that God is mad at us and we are so far from where he wants us to be shows me that you actually have no faith in God's perfection. The perfection of our existences is beyond our comprehension. And you want to tell God that we are not perfect in his creation? You believe you know how our society should be when it has ultimately been created by Him. Did Christians forget the word humble? Please stop thinking you know how every single situation and person is supposed to be because you read the bible. Have trust and faith in God's creation here because you are a part of it and you are perfect and everything is going to turn out as it's meant to. Be humble and peaceful and rejoice in this gift of life we have been given before Christianity really does turn into a terrorist group.

  3. I read this article and I agree with it to a point. It is sometimes hard to keep our dual citizenship straight — Kingdom of Heaven and American! Or maybe that is because we are not supposed to have dual citizenship – but to only be here on a diplomatic passport (ambassador status). I am curious tho …. does your theology include the doctrines of "calvinism?" I ask because as someone who does not see selective salvation in the scriptures as "calvinists" do ….. (i see it sometimes sounding that way) I find that often brothers/sisters with a calvinist stance tend to be harsh in their criticisms toward others.

    • Hello Robin,

      From what I can tell, the freedom of God to choose for His own purposes from those who would never choose Him is hardly something that Calvin came up with. I came to that perspective long before I knew much at all about Calvin or Calvinism. I'd suggest Romans 9 as a good place to start in understanding the issue. Just read it through without creative input or traditional impositions from outside sources and see what it has to say on the matter. As to your question, here's the URL for an article that I recently wrote on the subject of labels like "Calvinism":
      http://www.firebreathingchristian.com/archives/80

      I hope that the clarifications in the article are helpful and I appreciate your taking the time to chime in here.

      Have a good one!

      In His grip,

      Scott

  4. Yet again, another hollow calling for the other faiths to be removed. Another rant without details. Scott, I know for a fact my comment won’t get past moderation but that is okay, because this is just for you. Even if the church repented, what then? How do you expect to get rid of people who’s faiths are as strong as yours? How do you intend the church to enforce this idea on society? What does your scriptures say about dealing with followers of other Gods?

    You are a well written individual, but your articles are simply the “hot butter” you think of most Xtian works as. Go into detail. Are you scared your audience would be turned off if you went into exactly HOW the eradication of other Gods on the land would be enacted?

  5. I have read your article & frankly, I don't understand much of it. What are you suggesting we do to combat this situation, where do we start. We are so far from where God wants us to be & I am willing to do what is necessary, starting with prayer which I believe is most powerful. I fully agree we are not carrying out the Great Commission as we are commanded to do-what else are you suggesting? Margaret searching for answers.

    • Good morning Margaret and thank you so much for asking the very important (and very challenging, I think) question: What do we do? More specifically, Where do we start?

      The first part of the answer is one you've already identified: Prayer. We must pray for our own idols to be brought into the light, we must pray for the strength to face and repent of past and present idolatry, and we must pray for biblical grace with others that will enable us to be bold and firm in proclaiming hard truths while not doing so in a self-righteous manner.

      With prayerful submission to the clarity of Scripture in mind, one thing that we must focus on early on is what the Word has to say about religious pluralism. We have to set aside what we've been told by our culture and strive by the grace of God to dive deep into His Word for a proper position on this vital, culture-defining issue of religious pluralism.

      If we can then agree that the Word is plain as day on the subject – which I believe that it is – then we have to take the first step of accepting and advocating God's position on religious pluralism in whatever circles we have been placed in. For most of us, that means that we simply have honest, open conversations with people on the subject when it comes up. Just being honest and open with our advocacy is a much greater step than some might imagine, but it is very powerful nonetheless. The more people hear other people making an open case against religious pluralism, the more the culture will be moved. That movement may seem snail pace slow at times from our perspective, but our faithful proclamation of the Word is never in vain, and it is very important to remember that faithfully proclaiming God's Word on anything – especially the idolatry of "religious pluralism" – gives us an open door to easily reach the rest of the Gospel in the same conversation, including the Gospel command to repent, believe, and be saved.

      I hope that this at least begins to answer your very good and encouraging questions, Margaret.

      In His grip,

      Scott

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here