For some strange reason, I seem to be asked far more than most about the propriety (or impropriety) of men wearing long hair.

Okay, so maybe my being asked about this fairly regularly really isn’t so strange, weird or surprising at all, since I just happen to have long hair myself. Very long hair, actually, and I tentatively plan to keep it unless the Lord decides to call it home before He takes the rest of me, which is of course His prerogative.

(Lord willing, my long-term goal is to have sort of a “Gandalf look” in my later years. I very much like the thought of one day reading Scripture and other books to a mountain of grandchildren and great-grandchildren as that wise old Gandalfy type. More detail along these lines is pro’ly better spent in a future post, but you get the general idea.)

“So what’s the deal?”, some may wonder and even ask.

From time to time someone approaches me with something like, “You talk a lot about God this and Bible that and how important it is that we personally obey King Jesus in every way, so what’s up with the long hair, man?”

First off, assuming that this is being asked in a spirit of serious inquiry, there are three things that I try to remember when these opportunities present themselves:

  1. It’s reasonable and even good that people ask these things – particularly of those who claim to have a biblical worldview. The Christian worldview is marked by consistency, so it is important that we are always testing ourselves for the biblical consistency of our beliefs and practices. The Christian worldview covers everything because everything is defined by the Nature of Christ. (See: Art, math, beauty, logic, law and economics…it’s all about Him.)
  2. It’s important that we be challenged by others. Mature Christians ought to welcome such challenges as an opportunity to test their own position(s), clarify the understanding of those who ask these challenging questions, and demonstrate all along the way that mature people are not only willing but happy and honored to handle the challenge of “iron sharpens iron” style discussion and debate. Without these sorts of loving, corrective confrontations, the grace-fueled thick skin that we must develop in order to reliably function as mature Christians in a hostile world will never form, and we will remain as enslaved to our feelings and hobbled by our personal sensitivities as the average unregenerate Pagan. (See: Man up, buttercup. Rome wasn’t conquered in a day.)
  3. True love compels us to confront and correct one another. The true love of a Brother in Christ should compel them to ask me these sorts of questions when they perceive a clear departure from Scripture in any area of my life. This runs contrary to all that the world would have us believe about “love”, but Scripture is plain: If I truly love my Brother, I will strive to confront and correct him in a manner consistent with the Nature of our Lord as revealed in His Word.

With those points noted, let’s cut to the chase and get to The Passage that most folks tend to lean upon (and understandably so) when they address the issue of long hair on men:

Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a wife to pray to God with her head uncovered? Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him, but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering.

~ 1 Corinthians 11:13-15 (emphasis added)


That seems pretty clear, doesn’t it?

Sure does…at least when the passage is left alone in isolation like a solo lego or fortune cookie insert.

But what about those other passages that sure seem to make it plain that God doesn’t view long hair on a man as inherently shameful or sinful?

You know, like the record of Samson (in Judges) and the Nazarite vow (in Numbers). Things like that.

So what do we do with all of this? How do we come to a right understanding of what God is telling us on the subject of long hair on men when there seem to be equally clear and contradictory takes on the subject?

Here’s where I’d like to touch on one important principle of hermeneutics (which is just a ridiculously fancy word for “how we interpret Scripture”):

We must always interpret the cloudy in light of the clear.

When we see something that seems to be vaguely implied (or even strongly stated) in one passage, we need to seek out other passages dealing with the same subject so that we might then find the comprehensive contextual clarity required for us to rightly understand the issue in question.

Ascertaining which passages are more clear than others and which ones are more precise on particular points will often require that we go to the original languages in which Scripture was written. We have to be willing to do that and use what is found there if we are going to study Scripture seriously.

God’s Nature is not self-contradicting. Thus, God’s Word is not self-contradicting. Both are entirely and perfectly coherent, and it is the perfectly coherent Nature of God as revealed in His perfectly coherent Word that serves as the perfectly reliable foundation for life in practice everywhere in His creatiob.

So getting this Scripture thing right is kind of a big deal.

Even on hair.


At this point it’s worth noting that Scripture is loaded with references to hair. Hair matters. Hair is important to God. So it ought to be important to us.

So let’s get to it, with “it” being the answer to the question: Is it inherently shameful or sinful for men to wear long hair?

We’ll begin to chase down the answer by returning to the passage that, in most of its English translations, sure seems to respond to that question with a resounding “yes”:

Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a wife to pray to God with her head uncovered? Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him, but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering.

~ 1 Corinthians 11:13-15 (emphasis added)

In the original language, the terms used for “long hair” here are komao and kome. This passage is the only place in Scripture where these precise terms are used.

While the more generic term for hair – thrix – is used elsewhere, the more precise komao and kome convey an effeminate aspect to the manner or style in which long hair is kept. Komao and kome describe hair being worn “in tresses” or in a similarly ornamental fashion. Where thrix would be used to help convey the notion of “plain old long hair”, komao and kome are used to communicate the notion of elaborate or ornamental long hair.

Words matter.

Differences and distinctions in words matter.

God did not randomly or imprecisely choose any word used in any verse of any chapter of any book in Scripture. We cannot play games with even a single solitary word of His Word, even (and especially) when those games might seem to serve our own personal preferences or pet traditions.

If He had intended to convey “plain old long hair”, He would have used the precise term for it, as He did elsewhere. The fact that He purposefully chose a different term with distinctive meaning is not something we just get to ignore, even if most English translations make that sort of laziness easy for us. (Remember: However much the KJV-only types may protest, the Word of God was not originally written in English, King James style or otherwise.)

We don’t get to selectively dismiss distinctive, definitional aspects of any single word in God’s Word and simultaneously make a credible claim to faithfully cherishing, interpreting, and applying that Word.

We either submit to what He has actually said (in written form), or we do not. It really is that simple. We don’t get to tweak a little here or ignore a little there and then credibly lay claim to being lovers of Christ (Who is the Word made flesh).

The specific words chosen by God in the composition of 1 Corinthians 11:13-15 (and every other passage in Scripture) must be shielded from any obfuscation or manipulation so that, among other things, we will not create (intentionally or unintentionally) any apparent (but not actual) contradictions within Scripture.

When we see the presentation of the Nazarite vow in Deuteronomy 6 or the record of Samson in the book of Judges, we are not witnessing a contradiction in Scripture as those passages relate to 1 Corinthians 11.

We’re not seeing the presentation of two opposing lego blocks or fortune cookie snippets from which we may choose to build or support our own pet traditions and preferences as we see fit.

What we are seeing is the coherent, consistent presentation of God’s Nature as it is reflected in His creation where the subject of long hair on men is concerned. That full, coherent presentation tells us two things:

  1. Long hair on a man is not inherently shameful or sinful. (See: Samson and the Nazarite vow, for example.)
  2. Effeminate presentations (“ornamental tresses”, etc.) of long hair on a man is inherently shameful and sinful.

<<< ALERT: From this point forward, we’re moving onto “the gravy” or icing on the cake portion of this article, so to speak. The meat of the argument centers exclusively on the Word of God as examined above. What follows from here on out is extra stuff not to be taken with the same level of seriousness as the detailed examination of the specific words chosen by God to communicate in this particular passage. >>>

To help make this clearer, let’s return once again to 1 Corinthians 11:13-15, this time focusing on another aspect of the passage:

Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a wife to pray to God with her head uncovered? Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him, but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering.

Let’s take a look at the “what nature itself teaches us” about long hair on males, using an example that uniquely symbolizes the Lord and King that we want to honor and serve with all that we do – including the manner in which we deal with hair.

The example from nature to which I refer is the lion. You know, Aslan.

In order to help us along the way on this point, let’s have a look at some pictures of lions. See if you can detect which ones are male and which ones are female

Lioness 1Lion 1Lioness 2Lion 3

Okay, so how hard was it to tell the difference between the male and the female lions?

Not very hard, I’m guessin’…and why?

Because of the hair. More precisely, because of the long hair…on the males.

Is there anything effeminate about the long hair on these male lions?


Not at all.

It’s actually quite a masculine look, am I right?

So what is nature telling us here? More importantly, what is the Word of God telling us?

Is Scripture telling us that it is inherently shameful for a male to have long hair?

Or is it telling us that effeminate stylings of long hair on a male is inherently shameful and sinful?

The whole counsel of God seems to clearly present the latter position, as far as I can tell.

Which is why I welcome the question when it’s asked and thank you for taking the time to wade through this post.

As with all things, I encourage you to test what I’ve written here in light of His perfect Word. Go there. Dive deep. Test all things.

One final and very important item to tack on here, particularly for young men who are looking for a “case” to be made for growing out their hair in spite of their parents’ views on the subject.

I certainly understand how some young men in such scenarios may well desire to grow out their hair. Since I hold the biblical position that I do on the subject of long hair on men, I also believe that it is quite possible for the young men in question to prefer to wear their hair long out of completely pure motives, without being inspired in their preference by rebellion or sin. This is quite rare, particularly in our culture, but it is most certainly possible.

That said, if you are one of these young men who would like to wear your hair longer than your parents would like, and you think that you have found in this article a great tool or argument for your cause, please hear me clearly when I say: Stop.

Do not use this article or anything herein as an instrument with which to bludgeon, beat or argue with your parents in an unbiblical manner.

Might you share these ideas with them in a respectful manner in the hope of promoting better biblical understanding all around by all involved?


That would be a good thing.

But if your parents have made their position known, and their position calls for you to wear your hair shorter than you may prefer, then honor them and submit to their wishes on the subject. (See: Exodus 20:12; Ephesians 6:2; Matthew 15:4)

Do so happily and out of love for them, rather then begrudgingly and out of a sense of burdensome obligation.

Show them the self-sacrificial, respectful love that one would expect of a spiritually mature young Christian man.

Show them the character of Judah’s Lion and worry about the mane later.


If you’ve benefitted from the work done at Fire Breathing Christian, we ask that you
consider financially supporting the cause. You can do this in one of three ways:

You can drop a few bucks in the tip jar by making a one-time donation through PayPal.

You can make a regular contribution by joining our monthly support team.

You can use our affiliate link every time you order anything at

We depend on God’s provision through His faithful people.

Thank you for supporting Fire Breathing Christian!

Please check out our video channel and our news satire site.

Please Check Out Bordered 400pw

You can also help support the Fire Breathing Christian mission by checking out these books:

Stupid Elephant Tricks – The Other Progressive Party’s War on Christianity takes a painful but much needed look at how Christ-less “conservatism” has captivated Christians and co-opted them into helping march the culture ever deeper into darkness:

SET Blog Ad 550pw


The Beginning of Knowledge: Christ as Truth in Apologetics is an approachable, easy to read introduction to Christ-centered apologetics:

TBOK Blog Ad 550pw_____________________________________________________

Apathetic Christianity: The Zombie Religion of American Churchianity explores the tragic true horror story of all-American dead religion masquerading as Christianity:


On Education is a compilation of some of the most provocative and compelling Fire Breathing Christian articles on the subject of children’s education:

OE Amazon Ad 650pw


There Is No “God-Given Right” To Worship False Gods is a compilation of some of the most provocative Fire Breathing Christian articles on the subject of America’s embrace of a satanic approach to religious liberty:

TINGGRTWFG Amazon Ad 650pw


Fire Breathing Christians – The Common Believer’s Call to Reformation, Revival, and Revolution is the book that first presented the FBC mission to apply the Gospel-fueled Great Commission in every realm of God’s creation:

FBC Orig Blog Ad 550pw


An alternate white cover version of Fire Breathing Christians is available:

FBC White Blog Ad 550pw


There is also an alternate black cover version of Fire Breathing Christians:

FBC Black Blog Ad 550pw

Finally, here are a few good intro/reminder links for those of you who are new to Fire Breathing Christian and curious about exactly what’s goin’ on ’round here:

What are you, some kind of [insert label here] or something?!

What’s with that shark-fishie graphic thing?

Intro to Fire: The Power and Purpose of the Common Believer

When the Bible gets hairy. (Or: Is it right for men to have long hair?)

And especially this one: Never forget that apart from God’s grace you and I are complete morons.


19 Responses

  1. Is it wise or helpful for a man to make his long hair fashion statement (oh yes it is, brother) just a bit unnerving, then follow it up with a fairly preposterous exegetical exercise to cover the PR decision?

    It's a message. Our haircuts, personal grooming, sartorial choices, body piercings and tattoos and so on — are messages to the community. Those who have pledged their head to the King cease to draw attention to themselves or do things that cause others to stumble (Matt 18:6-7) (Mark 9:42) (Romans 14:21).

    Just like the shaved-head 'emergents', I notice that tattoos and long hair — the human markings of the Old Dark — are *de rigeur* today with manly-man men of the Church. It reminds me of the guy who drives up to the Church service in his rice-burner car with the glass-pack mufflers…then glares back at the affronted crowd walking into church.

    Rebellion hidden beneath layers and layers of sediment and 'learned' teaching…is still rebellion. In our culture, men have short hair and women wear long hair. The man with luxuriant tresses is saying exactly what the woman with a shaved head is saying: "Look at me, and wonder!"

    Prolly time to visit the barber, brother.

    Just saying. But hey…it's just Scripture.

  2. A question. Can a man have short or semi-long hair and at the same time semi-long bags? —I'm talking about the ones that don't are that long enough to end in the shoulders but that end on the face—

  3. Whenever someone appeals to "the" Greek, you know that you're about to be lied to by someone who doesn't like what the Scripture actually says. I wonder what "original" Greek text he is referring to.

    1. "Doesn't like what Scripture actually says"? Really? In what language was Scripture originally written, Phil? King James English?

  4. The Nazirite or, Nazarite vow is found in the sixth chapter of the book of Numbers, not Deuteronomy as stated in your article. The vow consists of three actions; not to participate in any consumption of wine or anything related to it, not to cut ones hair and not to touch a dead body. To fulfill that vow in our present day would mean 1. not to pursue the enjoyments of human life (wealth, power, possessions etc.) 2. not to be concerned about your personal appearance or in other words do not try to make yourself look good spiritually and 3. do not participate in the activities of the spiritually dead (unregenerate). The Lord has stated that He will not drink of the wine of the new covenant until He "enjoys it" with us anew in His Kingdom. I believe this means that as the many brothers of Christ, we are to keep this vow with Him until all things are fulfilled.

      1. Pouting little girl line? That sounds to me like the response of someone with the maturity level to have hair like yours.

        1. The response to your pouting is already presented in the above article, which you have thus far done nothing substantive to refute. (Hint: Making/shouting an unsubstantiated claim or opinion is not a substantive refutation and relying on such an approach to make a case is a fairly glaring sign of immaturity.)

          If you have something substantive to say, feel free. I'd like to see it and will consider it if offered. If not, you're only proving the above points with each added comment.

  5. Is it then true that women should have short hair due to the lions? How does the 1Cor. Passage make sense? I would appreciate more information to dig in more yo your interpretation of this topic.

    1. The lion illustration was peripheral at best. The actual text of the passage as originally written in Greek is the point.

      1. I might try to address other issues touched on in the passage (like women's hair) in a future post, but the point of this post was to go straight to the actual text of the passage to determine whether it was conveying a blanket condemnation of long hair on men.

        I hope that this clarification is helpful.

        Thanks for chiming in!

  6. Have you noticed how many Emergent pastors have shaved faces and heads?

    It's a sign, though they may not overtly comprehend, of deep grief. Of what, their own soul death by alleging to Emergent gobbledygook? Or they are ashamed of going bald? It hides baldness like an untucked shirt hides a belly… not very well.

  7. I'm very glad you wrote on this. Maybe we'll have a chance to talk about it some more. You've brought up some thoughtful points.

    1. Thanks, Caleb!

      I look forward to talking soon and hearing your thoughts.

      Hope all is well in your neck o' the woods.

  8. I have actually wondered the flip side of this: is it wrong for women to have short hair? I asked this because I wanted to get a pixie cut and wasn’t sure if that was OK. A mentor helped me see this verse in context and we came to a similar conclusion that you did. Short hair on women is OK, as long as it looks feminine, not masculine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *